0
Here's a new type of poll. You may choose up to 2 options (it won't allow you to pick more). If you do not see an option which fits your vote, you may add your own poll option by clicking on "Add Write-In Vote" (this will add your username next to the newly added poll option)
You may change your vote (perhaps someones new option is better than your previously voted option)
I was going to try and phrase this generically, but why skirt the issue.
If Force players are found to have committed offences as reported in teh SMH - what should the punishment be?
I originally thought sacking them was the only option, but upon reflection wondered if this would be cutting off our noses despite our face - they could possibly just move to another union. I'm more inclined to go with suspension or some other internal discipline in addtition to HEFTY community service in a related community group. By hefty I mean in the region of 400 hours (one full day a week for a year)
[Edit: The following added in response to post below]
I'm going on worse case scenario: 4-5 players abusing animals (the whole catching with a milk crate swan dive, swinging by tail thing).
The reason I'm posting this when the allegations are yet to be proved is that if the worse does happen, perhaps if anyone out there reads this place they may see there are options other than immediately ripping up a contract. TWF probably has a good cross section of supporters and may provide some sort of feeling for supporter back lash should the allegations be founded.
If the allegations do prove to be unfounded we can breathe a sigh of relief and go back to bashing the SMH with renewed rigor...