Surely Pek is suitable enough if the Wallabies benched him as hooker
Printable View
Surely Pek is suitable enough if the Wallabies benched him as hooker
Yeah...those bloody bookies get ya in the end every time....
Pek is not NEW to the Force - they attempted to recruit 2 new Hookers - during the off season - No New Hooker found / contracted. Had the Force said at any stage during the pre-season that they were happy to run with what they had I would have paid out - Pek and Ryan are awesome Hookers
TQO - the inescapable logic is:
We already had Pek & Ryan, therefore there was no hooker required. We may have been out fishing but it was not required!
I believe a Royal Commission is called for in this matter.
Then why did the Western Force try to recruit at least two new Hookers - I did not tell them to do this I just acted on the facts i.e.e that they tried till the last days before the season started to recruit one.
My personal take on all of this this has been that Pek is not playing in his preferred/ possibly strongest position.
I understand where all of you are coming from and agree now the 3 Hookers we have look ample - then it was so clear
TQO
One might also ask why we have so many Props - although I for one agree there is no such thing as too many props.
It is handy - because it improves the overall IQ and good looks of the team - but it is not REQUIRED!!
Right Folks I'm closing this thread - I'm not the Western Force - I did not decide has many hookers, props et al were required, nor did I instigate events to facilitate the acquisition of more nor do I pretend to understand the mechanisms of the cerebral matter of those that do