Arbitration hearing - Western Force v ARU - 31.07.2017

Organismic. Or maybe the seminal egg?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BLR

Is this good or bad?

---

Good, if he rules in our favour it's because he's a reasonable and knowledgeable rugby follower if not we can appeal based upon his obvious conflict of interest

As the walls close in on Cameron "patsy" Cline, the musicologists amongst us can reflect on some of his timeless greatest hits-
Crazy
Strange
So wrong
Faded love
You're stronger than me
Leavin'on your mind
and..........
I fall to pieces....

Howzat......(ARU)

How how howzat
You messed about
I caught you out
Howzat
Now that I found where you're at
It's goodbye
Well howzat
It's goodbye

Case to be heard 10AM AEST (8am perth time) on Wednesday
Presiding officer: Justice D Hammerschlag

For any of you in sydney and want more details of where the court case is see link below
https://onlineregistry.lawlink.nsw.g...ommercialList/

Another aspect of this bloody alliance agreement that bugs me- if the ARU claim it was a 'new' agreement, then doesn't the original contract need to be formally cancelled and also signed off by BOTH parties before replacing it with a new one. Essentially, how many 'changes/adjustments can be made to a contract before it's called 'new'?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by volvo

Presiding officer: Justice D Hammerschlag

---

Well he's Saffa born rather NSW at least, hopefully that is a good sign!

https://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/new...me-court-judge

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valzc

Essentially, how many 'changes/adjustments can be made to a contract before it's called 'new'?

---

I guess that's an arbitrary decision.

" arbitrary - Legal Definition. adj. Determined or founded on individual discretion, especially when based on one's opinion, judgment, or prejudice, rather than on fixed rules, procedures, or law." HTH. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valzc

Another aspect of this bloody alliance agreement that bugs me- if the ARU claim it was a 'new' agreement, then doesn't the original contract need to be formally cancelled and also signed off by BOTH parties before replacing it with a new one. Essentially, how many 'changes/adjustments can be made to a contract before it's called 'new'?

---

Also SARU considers it an continued (just modified) agreement while ARU believe it is a new agreement

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by volvo

Justice D Hammerschlag

---

Sounds like a mid-level boss in sword'n'sorcery video game.

I am consoling myself that the ARU might be right. After Bledisloe One's record points concession and poorest ever crowd at ANZ stadium, sacking the Force is so obviously the solution.

Eyes up ARU.

FMG announced a 110% increased profit today. :D