0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/down_dis.png)
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
NSW Waratahs coach Chris Hickey has called on the ARU to introduce a salary cap concession for veteran Super Rugby players, which could help them retain captain Phil Waugh.
The ARU is bringing in a $4.4 million salary cap next year to replace the player payment protocols under which the five Australian teams do not pay players more than $110,000 plus expenses. Veterans have been exempt under that system.
While teams can now pay players whatever they like, keeping in mind no player can be paid less than $60,000, there are no concessions for long-serving players.
Both the AFL and NRL have salary cap concessions for veteran players.
In the AFL only half the payment to veteran players over 30 or who have completed 10 years with their current club is included in the salary cap.
NRL clubs are allowed to spend an extra $200,000 on players who have been at one club for eight years.
Waugh, 31, has played for the Waratahs since 1999.
As openside flanker Waugh is unlikely to receive a top-up from the ARU, he needs to command a good salary from the Waratahs or may look to continue his career overseas.
"If you are going to have some mechanism in place such as a salary cap, there does need to be room to move on players, perhaps like Phil Waugh, who has played at the Waratahs for such a long period of time," Hickey said.
Rugby Union Players Association chief executive Greg Harris said a salary exemption for veteran players was worth considering.
"That would be an issue that could be discussed in the full context of the Collective Bargaining Agreement," Harris said.
Read more: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...-1226052860337
There should be something in it for long serving players. I know the AFL doesn't suffer from having overseas clubs competing for signatures but when Aussie Super Rugby players look to top up the Super fund they usually go North. Having 5 sides is supposed to increase the depth in Australian Rugby but it won't do that if people start heading North when their Wallaby playing days are over. The Phil Waugh example is a good one - he can pass on stuff to younger players comming through at the Waratahs.
The uproar over Sharpies contract would come close but he wouldn't meet the criteria of a long serving player only because the Force have only been around for 5 and a bit years. (Although some loyalty from the ARU would have been nice on that front)
Last edited by jargan83; 10-05-11 at 12:18.
If they made concessions on the basis of length of time in the club then it would be massively biased against the Rebels and moderately biased against the Force. You could only fairly do it on the basis of consecutive time spent in Australian rugby.
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
Maybe kick in at 6 six years for the Force and Rebels, rising to match eight years for the other three?
"Bloody oath we did!"
Nathan Sharpe, Legend.
By the sounds of it the Rebels won't be having any difficulty paying players (granted only media speculation so far)
With the cap comming in next year possibly look to have somthing similar to Burgs where long serving players can be counted at 6 years and raising to 8 with time ie long service kicks in after 7 years in 2013 and 8 in 2014 for the Force
I've seen that West Coast and Fremantle can recruit under the "Father/Son" rule - I'm not sure how that has worked
Perhaps special dispensation can be given to players who have joined new franchises by the ARU?
There would not be many cases of a player needing special dispensation anyway given that the Force largely recruited youth during it's initial recruiting phase
Not alot of hope for either West Aussie fumbleball sides to pick him up last year as the GC got all the draft picks that mattered
Brandon Matera is also the nephew of one of the Matera boys
West Coast could pick him up when he is done learning his game at GC and come back West if they can afford him given the salary cap concessions GC and GWS will receive
The only reason I brought up the father/son rule is that West Coast despite being a young club at the time picked up Ben Cousins under the Father/Son rule in 1995, just as a compariosn for an idea or two about how new clubs could handle a situation similar to what is being discussed.
Last edited by jargan83; 10-05-11 at 14:14.
So lucky the smote has gone!!!
![]()
"Bloody oath we did!"
Nathan Sharpe, Legend.
The uproar over Sharpies contract would come close but he wouldn't meet the criteria of a long serving player only because the Force have only been around for 5 and a bit years. (Although some loyalty from the ARU would have been nice on that front).....
He's still been loyal to Australian Rugby....so some loyalty from the ARU SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXPECTED.....
"The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David
You've got to ask yourself what the purpose of this type of clause is. I think the argument, as you suggest Jargs, is that these players have a lot to pass on to the young players and it keeps experience in Australia as well as rewarding those who stay in the Australian rugby system. So does it really matter whether they have played for one team for 8 years or if they have been in Australian rugby for 8 years?
Or, is this just Chris Hickey/the Waratahs trying to wrangle themselves a bit of an advantage?
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
"The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David
Cheers Shasta and GAFFA - I don't care enough about Vicball to look it up
That was the first example that occured to me. It works in the NRL/AFL so I assumed it would work in the Rugby set up. If the ARU kept the central payment method it would probably work the way you have hinted at.
Only problem is you may have players playing a while for a club who may not neccesarily play long term for Australia, where as in the past those players have just looked overseas for a gig there could be a chance of retaining that talent here in Oz.
I guess this is a work in progress that we will have to wait on
IMHO this salary cap thing is plan stupid coming out of a rugby world cup year - I appreciate that the Euro is not worth as much how and ever a lot of talent will just vapourise
61 years between Grand SlamsWas the wait worth it - Ya betta baby