Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44

Thread: Holy haka batman

  1. #16
    Champion KenyaQuin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,264
    vCash
    5000000
    KQ Jr, at 3 already a Wallaby supporter through and through, makes a beeline for the telly the second he knows the Haka is coming on and it manages to keep his interest in the actual game for another 5 minutes or so..

    Miss Little KQ, another one-eyed Wallaby supporter at 6 and hater of anything All Blacks, is transfixed during the Haka after which she makes a decision on whether to watch the game or not..if its the Wallabies, she'll keep watching; if its any other team, it would depend on her mood at the time..

    Given that C7 skip all the pre-game stuff during their delayed midnight telecast, I'm now forced to download the game soon as it's available (usually early next morning) purely for the anthems, and the Haka if an All Black game.

    As Beige said, it's a drawcard. The standard practice (presumably by gentleman's agreement) for the past few years has been that the opposing teams lineup almost 15-20m away, this is simply formalising it, isn't it? Last thing we need is a finger poked into someone's eye; and a recurring debate on what is an appropriate response to the Haka.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #17
    Veteran Sheikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,950
    vCash
    29038136
    I wouldn't mind the haka so much if they didn't have the anthem, too. Surely it's biased to be able to have two songs.

    But agree that if the ABs can have the haka, the Argentinians should be allowed to tango and the English to have a morris dance!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #18
    Champion KenyaQuin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,264
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by MI5_Dog View Post
    As naive as this may be as a question but what's stopping the Australians doing a Corroboree lead by one of the indigenous players?
    Quote Originally Posted by The InnFORCEr View Post
    The iRB
    Really? I think that when the idea was floated, it was proposed that it would not be performed by the players but rather by a indigenous group seperate to the players..hence it was knocked back by the IRB.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #19
    Immortal Contributor The InnFORCEr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West Leederville
    Posts
    16,963
    vCash
    3212000
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheikh View Post
    I wouldn't mind the haka so much if they didn't have the anthem, too. Surely it's biased to be able to have two songs.
    Three songs actually, two anthems and the haka

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?

    Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!

    Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!

  5. #20
    Champion Contributor jazza93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    the beach
    Posts
    2,068
    vCash
    5000000
    What a stupid rule. It is just a massive logic fail on the IRB's behalf. How can they make rules for what teams can and can't do during the haka.

    They should change it to something like:

    Both teams are free to act, and make whatever noise they choose on their respective half of the pitch before kick off. This ensures all teams get to go through thier respective pre match activities and prepare to their best ability for the game.

    From here they can make guidelines on what both teams can and can't do during this time. Not just what one team can do, and how the other team must act during this time. That is creating a double standard.

    If i were the owner of a large company. I would be sponsering the Wallabies for whatever the IRB fines them to act freely on their half of the pitch during the haka.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #21
    Veteran Contributor normie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beenup Heights
    Posts
    3,175
    vCash
    5000000
    Every opposition team should be allowed the right of reply to the haka.
    After all, after a spiffing greeting like that it is only fitting - and a mark of respect- to reply in some unique and meaningful way that typifies the warrior-like spirit encompassing the 'combat' that is about to begin.

    Using the England team as an example, a routine could be contrived based on a famous battle - "The Charge of the Light Brigade". The forwards could be horses with the backs being the mounted cavalrymen. The reserve bench could be the stretcher bearers.

    The Scots could base theirs on Macbeth's triumph over the Norwegians in circa 1600;

    The Welsh have plenty of material -the defeat of the English in the Battle of Bryn Glas, for example;

    The Irish have plenty of historically significant donnybrooks to call on (some not involving civil war or the English)...


    Of course some creative work would be required for the French and Italian versions....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by normie; 10-09-10 at 13:25.

  7. #22
    Legend Court Reporter
    Contributor
    James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bridgetown, WA
    Posts
    6,132
    vCash
    28000
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheikh View Post
    I wouldn't mind the haka so much if they didn't have the anthem, too. Surely it's biased to be able to have two songs.

    But agree that if the ABs can have the haka, the Argentinians should be allowed to tango and the English to have a morris dance!
    We have Waltzing Matilda at home games.

    The problem with having some sort of corroboree is what if none of the four odd indigenous players who are currently Wallabies are actually playing. Also, I think most of the team would struggle to relate to it.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.

  8. #23
    Champion Contributor jazza93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    the beach
    Posts
    2,068
    vCash
    5000000
    The Wallabies should get on their knees and pray towards Mecca during the haka tomorrow. Then lets see the IRB fine us.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #24
    Legend Contributor blueandblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    6,107
    vCash
    9084664
    Quote Originally Posted by normie View Post
    ....
    The Scots could base theirs on Macbeth's triumph ....
    Do you mean "The Scottish play's triumph"?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "12 Years a Supporter" starring the #SeaOfBlue

  10. #25
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    23,288
    vCash
    516000
    Nah normie, the only appropriate response is to stand there shaking in your studs with a little bit of wee dribbling down your jock strap, anything less is disrespectful and means they are going to belt you...because they wouldn't have belted you otherwise.
    The whole thing has become a wank.
    Something that culturally sensitive doesn't belong around sportsmen.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

  11. #26
    Senior Player Contributor Cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Busselton
    Posts
    832
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by normie View Post
    Every opposition team should be allowed the right of reply to the haka.
    After all, after a spiffing greeting like that it is only fitting - and a mark of respect- to reply in some unique and meaningful way that typifies the warrior-like spirit encompassing the 'combat' that is about to begin.

    Using the England team as an example, a routine could be contrived based on a famous battle - "The Charge of the Light Brigade". The forwards could be horses with the backs being the mounted cavalrymen. The reserve bench could be the stretcher bearers.

    The Scots could base theirs on Macbeth's triumph over the Norwegians in circa 1600;

    The Welsh have plenty of material -the defeat of the English in the Battle of Bryn Glas, for example;


    The Irish have plenty of historically significant donnybrooks to call on (some not involving civil war or the English)...


    Of course some creative work would be required for the French and Italian versions....
    I'd have thought something equally traditional for facing the maori's would be appropriate. Not sure what firearms the English were using at the time of the Maori wars (Martini Henry?) but everyone could form the defensive square and prepare for traditional colonial warfare rifles ready, as a reply.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #27
    Veteran Sheikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,950
    vCash
    29038136
    Quote Originally Posted by Cowboy View Post
    I'd have thought something equally traditional for facing the maori's would be appropriate. Not sure what firearms the English were using at the time of the Maori wars (Martini Henry?) but everyone could form the defensive square and prepare for traditional colonial warfare rifles ready, as a reply.
    Could get a touch insensitive if the English did this against South Africa, unless they also have Michael Caine there saying "Zulus! Thousands of them!"

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #28
    Senior Player Contributor Cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Busselton
    Posts
    832
    vCash
    5000000
    Not sure who would be angrier in a SA vs England version of this, the descendants of the Zulu's or the descendants of the Boer's.

    Great way to upset people in these sanitised times.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  14. #29
    Legend
    Apprentice Bookie
    Contributor .X.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,718
    vCash
    -14707739
    I have always considered the The traditional Haka (Ka Mate) as a challenge that should be "respectfully" responded too.

    I recall The_InnFORCEr writing an article here in TWF about a source suggesting that the Wallabies accepting that challenge.

    The newer Haka Kapango(sp) (ending with the throat slitting jesture) was apparently choreographed specifically for the All Blacks. I fail to see how this is considered a tradition and it should not be allowed to be performed prior to any Test Match.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Exile
    Port Macquarie


    "Let me tell you something you already know. The world ain’t all sunshine and rainbows. It’s a very mean and nasty place and I don’t care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain’t about how hard ya hit. It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That’s how winning is done! Now if you know what you’re worth then go out and get what you’re worth. But ya gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain’t where you wanna be because of him, or her, or anybody! Cowards do that and that ain’t you! You’re better than that!" - Rocky Balboa

  15. #30
    Veteran zimeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    3,128
    vCash
    5000000
    [YOUTUBE]hVlGDa5mx28[/YOUTUBE]

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Accepting the Haka Challenge.
    By shasta in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17-02-08, 20:17
  2. All Blacks dazzled by haka ballet
    By Burgs in forum Rugby World Cup
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-09-07, 21:06
  3. Awesome article regarding war dances, ie haka, etc
    By frontrow in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 19-09-07, 21:30
  4. Springboks plan Zulu haka
    By Burgs in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 18-07-07, 17:57
  5. Haka and Rugby
    By Burgs in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-07-06, 18:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •