0
Yeah, but 7's is too much like league for my liking. It's simple to understand for non-rugby people and there's usually enough excitement for highlights, so I can well understand why it's the game the Olympics will accept.
But 10's is actual rugby, with proper rugby-style tactics. A game for all sizes, just like 15's. Eg, do you pick a big pack for the set-pieces or a mobile pack for the break-down, but which will lose 75% of the scrums and line-outs?
I'm not arguing aesthetics - I'm arguing practicalities. With the support that 7s gets all over the world you can't just ignore that.
Surely someone's been having a lend of Pie over this. Otherwise you've got Dilip Kumar openly suggesting professional Rugby players have outgrown the playing area with their increased speed, strength and stamina. A theory which has some truth to it IMHO.
Next thing you know we'll have some tosser suggesting a "hybrid" game with 13-a-side. The sky is falling, the sky is falling!!
"The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David
What if you went further and reduced the teams to eleven players, legalised shepherding and allowed one forward pass every phase?
Or do away with the offside rule and allow mark to be called anywhere on the field...
.........and dissallow tackling of any kind or even any contact that may cause a person to fall over.
Posted via space
Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
And cut their sleeves off so no one can grab them there...and tight shorts.
Well, at least you'd get an american team who don't get beaten 80-0 in every World Cup.
runnn.....runnn.....Headmaster O'Neils coming!!!!!!
I think my catch at the Highlanders game should have counted seeing how far back from the field we were.