0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/down_dis.png)
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Easy Tiger....what I meant was in rugby the set up is different and, for example, in Australia only rugby players playing in Australia represent the national side, so there is no conflict in the scheduling of tests there. On this issue, at present, there is very little comparison between what happens in soccer to rugby because of the way it is structured and this is the case for most, if not all, of the top teams.Originally Posted by Happy
Cool down dude, should be a happy Happy since you are going on holiday next week.![]()
Just happy to be here
there might not be a conflict of tests but the same problem we see right now with teams PRIORITISING the games they want to win is a conflict!
S.A. has clearly left to tour hoping to fullfill their rugby commitments without risking 20 of their players.
The same way N.Z. did with S14.
To me that's a conflict that you can't stop nor police.
Chuck Norris has the greatest Poker-Face of all time. He won the 1983 World Series of Poker, despite holding only a Joker, a Get out of Jail Free Monopoly card, a 2 of clubs, 7 of spades and a green #4 card from the game Uno.
The Wallabies/AB's need to concentrate on the team on the field , not whose in and whose out. If SA happens to beat any of them it's all been justified.Rugby needs to be played on the field. We may be treated to some SA running football instead of the negative style they seem to slip into from time to time. In the end history will show the winner not SA was resting players.
LET THE GAMES BEGIN!
The backs are just there to look pretty
trueOriginally Posted by Front Row Factory
Chuck Norris has the greatest Poker-Face of all time. He won the 1983 World Series of Poker, despite holding only a Joker, a Get out of Jail Free Monopoly card, a 2 of clubs, 7 of spades and a green #4 card from the game Uno.