0
How can you be certain it was 30 players, so far Matt Giteau, Drew Mitchell, Nathan Sharpe and Richard Brown have all denied having any involvement. I'm quite certain that out of a squad of 32 last year that means only 28 could have signed the vote...unless they're all lying and were tortured into saying it
How on Earth is a newspaper in Sydney more reliable than the word of a player...or 4?Originally Posted by joondalup_dave
If he is saying things then he should be old enough to deal with that. Like you keep saying they are told to keep with their code of silence, but if there really was one then surely he would have had his butt hauled over the coals by now. Obviously players can say whatever they like and then they have to deal with the consequences. As much as it pains me to rehash the quokka thing. The boys did the crime and were dealt with, you stuff up you cop it. Simple as that. If Haig gets in trouble thats his own problem, no one forced him to say anything and no one else should be held accountable. Same goes for any other player.Originally Posted by joondalup_dave
Besides why should Haig Sare get in trouble for voicing his opinion?