Final scores please.

[Woody]

their two AllBlacks and one fringe.

Hope you understand me clearly now.

BTW, what's wrong with a bit of Pro-Force optimism on a Force supporter's site?

Noice Gigs. Their backrow (6&7) are very talented but need very good front foot ball to be effective (kinda liteweight flashy dudes), very well suited to games like they had last week (and grounds like Perths). 8 is a solid journeyman.
I'd say that the Force 6,7,8 will shade them if the 5 do the bizo. Individually the Force tightys have shown, in the first two games, what they can do. If Sharpie leads and the other 4 follow they'll lay the platform.
I'm quietly optimistic (will be noisy later) with my score predication (that'd be 5 points, and away from the spoon).

[normie]

Force 28 Chiefs 28

[GIGS20]

You do know what a breakdown is?

Cheap shot.....Isn't it interesting that some people, rather than argue, will question the history, or veracity of who it is they are arguing with........I don't care for that. plenty of people here seem to agree with what I'm saying right now, so I guess if we differ in our understandings of what a breakdown is I gues you'd be the one everybody thinks has got it wrong.

But i may be mistaken, I'm trying to discuss this, not have a personal tete 'a' tete

I was clear in my discussion of what I think would happen at the breakdown, I was clear on where I thought the game would be won or lost, I was clear how I thought the respective players would match up against their opponents.

In the end, it's only the opinion of one very dyed in the wool Force fan vs a fair weather supporter who can ony name the guys on the injury list.......

Good luck to you Bronsk, go bet your house on the Chiefs......just don't come running to me for a roof if the Force get up!

[Bronski Beat]

[QUOTE=GIGS20;246691]You do realise Bam's not in the tight five don't you Bronski?



Slightly patronising don't you think? Play the ball not the man.

All I have said and some do agree (The realists) that we are probably going to get dusted unless JOC shows up in his new role. He could very well do, in fact I think we all know he is destined for this role. My question was too much too soon?

I guess we will all see tommorow night, and mate, if you have bet your house on the Force dusting the Chiefs, don't come crying to me!

The bookies are paying $3.00 to the Chiefs btw.

[mudskipper]

mudskippers abacus

Rugby Science
Chiefs 4T + 2C + 4P = 36
Force 2T + 1C + 3P = 21

[The Lone Hydrangea]

Noice Gigs. Their backrow (6&7) are very talented but need very good front foot ball to be effective (kinda liteweight flashy dudes), very well suited to games like they had last week (and grounds like Perths). 8 is a solid journeyman.
I'd say that the Force 6,7,8 will shade them if the 5 do the bizo. Individually the Force tightys have shown, in the first two games, what they can do. If Sharpie leads and the other 4 follow they'll lay the platform.
I'm quietly optimistic (will be noisy later) with my score predication (that'd be 5 points, and away from the spoon).

Beautifully put Woody. Force with belief....5.

[slomo]

EWF by 6.....

[BDAVEY]

Chiefs 34 Force 12

[todd4]

mudskippers abacus

Rugby Science
Chiefs 4T + 2C + 4P = 36
Force 2T + 1C + 3P = 24

Muddy, I think your abacus may be broke..... by my calculations your Force score should be 21...

---------- Post added at 22:10 ---------- Previous post was at 22:06 ----------

Force 32 Chiefs 23

[palitu]

Muddy, I think your abacus may be broke..... by my calculations your Force score should be 21...

---------- Post added at 22:10 ---------- Previous post was at 22:06 ----------

Force 32 Chiefs 23

i was going to say, i dont know how to read one... but what does that one add up to?

[Gean]

Think the word you were really looking for was pessimistic

Well someone has to be realistic........Chiefs 28 - 18

Ohhhhhh OUCHIE !!

The heart doesnt always get what it wants

[Bronski Beat]

Posted via Mobile Device

[GIGS20]

Slightly patronising don't you think? Play the ball not the man.

not at all, when I say out tight five will dominate theirs and our weakened backrow will get an easier time because of it you responded by telling me the source of the weakening in our backrow......I needed to check whether you thought Bam was a lock.

As it happens, the five didn't even match theirs, that was the tale of the tape for me.....once we lost the only advantage we had any possibility of gaining, we were stuffed!

I reckon we can come away with a draw this week!

[brokendown gunfighter]

Posted via Mobile Device

one of your finest posts BB