0
Sorry, don't agree, we didn't use Firepower at all, the player's managers did. Whether the players would have come to the without the third party top ups only they and their managers know. The similarity here is that Visy is dodgy and sponsors the 'Tahs, Firepower was dodgy and sponsored the I don't know or care which players have third party agreements with visy because the club can't have any part of that anyway.
That's one part of this story that really pisses me off, People say Firepower paid Matt Giteau a couple million to come to Perth, and I'd suggest that's right, but it has NOTHING to do with the because the rules say it can't. so let's compare apples with apples!
BTW if you want to talk third party payments and the players wouldn't have come to perth bullshit, well none of the affected players have failed to renew their contract have they?