0
Just been looking at the ARU's Annual Report for 2016. One of the four "strategic pillars" they focused on in 2016 was "creating excellence in how the game is run". They scored themselves a very flattering 6/10 on that!! Not sure what sort of formula they used to calculate that sort of success rate but it seems a wee bit flawed to me!
The other 3 pillars were:
"Making rugby a game for all" 9/10!
"Igniting Australia's passion for the game" another 9/10 for that one! Huh??!
"Building sustainable success in professional rugby" a lowly 4/10 for that one. Tut tut. Which is presumably why the push to go from 5 to 4. But in my (admittedly simple) mind, surely if you get 9/10 for the first two, that should lead to more than 4/10 for the third one, no??