0
New rules will change bench role
By Bret Harris
February 04, 2008
THE experimental laws to be introduced to Super 14 are likely to create a faster game with an increased amount of time with the ball in play, most coaches think.
As a result, players are expected to become more fatigued, particularly in the last 20 minutes of the game. But many coaches may be reluctant to go to their bench because of the restrictive rules that govern the use of reserves.
One solution is to adopt rugby league's interchange system. In the NRL teams are allowed 10 interchanges a game, whereas in rugby union once a player is replaced he cannot come back on, except if a front-rower is needed so scrums can continue.
"We need to get to an interchange situation as they do in the 13-man game," Australia and Crusaders coach Robbie Deans said. "At the moment, coaches are loath to replace players because once they have been replaced they can't come back on.
"If you get injuries and the game is a bit faster, you are going to be very vulnerable if you end up being a man down.
"The way we approach the management of the bench needs to be changed.
"That will be a good outcome because everyone works just as hard, whether they are starting or coming on.
"They all train as hard and it would be good for reserves to have access to be able to play."
Apart from this one concern, Deans is an enthusiastic supporter of the new laws, designed to promote attacking rugby.
The new laws include: not passing back to the 22 for a kick out on the full; throwing the ball backwards from a quick lineout; standing five metres behind the scrum in defence and awarding more free-kicks than penalties for infringements.
Deans said teams that were prepared to take the initiative would gain from the new laws.
"I believe we will end up with the ball in play for a little bit longer," Deans said. "I believe the game will be faster. We'll see more tries scored.
"And the reason for that is there is now an ability for teams to initiate play where, in the past, we had to wait for re-starts.
"Whoever takes the initiative, that's what the game is designed to do.
"Ideally, a good game, no matter what code, is a game whereby attack has scope and teams that play constructively and seek to attack are rewarded.
"Where I think we saw at the World Cup teams preferred not to have the ball. It doesn't make for a very great spectacle."
While Deans believes rugby will retain its varied bodyshapes under the new laws, he suspects the nature of certain positions could change.
"Changes in positions is going to be one of the most fascinating areas for me," Deans said.
"In the past teams have had the ability to distribute the ball. The Crusaders have had three pivots at 10, 12 and 15. It makes a big difference in your ability to attack. With the new laws around the scrum it is a lot easier to gain forward momentum with the extra five metres available to you so you get in behind the defensive line.
"That's the feedback we've received from our forwards. They have felt the stress at having to get back behind the defensive line.
"Whether that profits the team that has distributors and can run all day or whether that profits teams with big midfielders, who may not be as good as distributors, but it is easier to get to the outside channel so their lesser skill set might be adequate.
"Look at South Africa. The suggestion has been that it may compromise them, but I also think when they've got position they can rumble forward whereas when you've had a backline on the gain-line it's been harder for them to be effective.
"I'd like to think that with the increased amount of time in play with the ball that it will reward those who have skills."