Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Wallabies branded 'crap'

  1. #16
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    22,918
    vCash
    420000
    I haven't seen any Finals matches as yet so I don't know about England but in general he is right, Australia has a crap Front Row because crap (and specifically two) players keep getting persisted with.
    If the new Wallaby Coach does only one thing different to Eddie and Knuckles I pray that is he drops Trestle and Donut for ever!
    They are barely Super 14 worthy, let alone International Props!
    We can continue with our head in the sand saying all the bad press is wrong or actually accept the facts and start developing better options.
    It is a sad indictment on Australian Props that our best in the last few years hasn't been a dominating player but Bill Young who played out of his skin to keep us competitive by using every conceivable trick in the book, mainly illegal, so our Forwards weren't totally humiliated.
    In my mind the new Squad needs to identify at the end of this Super 14 Season four players for each of the three positions who will be there in 2011 and focus on developing them as a unit.
    That doesn't preclude others from playing Tests, just that there will be a special focus on the unit structure of the chosen development players.
    You would imagine that this would see the best front row from each Aus S14 anyway but that was proven not to be the case this year with the omission of McIsaac and Jeremy Paul.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

  2. #17
    Senior Player Contributor hopep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Leederville
    Posts
    592
    vCash
    5000000
    Well you wont see any change if McKenzie gets the nod. He refers to 'Trestle' as his "protoge", I'm happy to admit we need a renewed vigour and structure in the front row, but overall the forwards played OK in RWC matches. Yes the Poms were the toughest encounter - but the scrums did not cost us the game, the breakdown cost us the game. That was my point - and the fact that Poms have no concept of seeing anything in postive in their own team, they 'only won because (insert team) played crap'. not a suportive sentiment.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #18
    Legend Court Reporter
    Contributor
    James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bridgetown, WA
    Posts
    6,117
    vCash
    22000
    I think Australia is and has always been a master of using ball from a successful set-piece (or at least with Larkham anyway). Yeah the Poms beat us at the breakdown but that was compounded by our ineptitude in the scrum. Its been so long since we've got quality ball off the back of a scrum (we weren't even getting quality line-out ball in 2005) we've forgotten about all of those extra attacking options. Fix the scrum and we are less dependent on winning the battle of the breakdown.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Wallabies claim quarter-final berth
    By Jehna in forum Front Page News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25-09-07, 13:10
  2. I'm sorry but FFS
    By The EnForcer in forum Wallabies
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 13-08-07, 21:48
  3. Wallabies can't waste momentum
    By Burgs in forum Wallabies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-07-07, 09:59
  4. Brave Wallabies pipped by Springboks
    By Burgs in forum Wallabies
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 18-06-07, 16:59
  5. Are You A Wallabies Supporter Living Overseas?
    By The InnFORCEr in forum Wallabies
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-08-06, 17:28

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •