Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 82

Thread: We are going to get a new rectangular stadium - allegedly.

  1. #61
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,265
    vCash
    5112000
    Quote Originally Posted by GIGS20 View Post
    I agree Sheikh. The only proviso would be to consider how big the crowd of the Western Force and Glory would be by 2022......40,000 might not be out of the ballpark if the franchises were managed properly!
    If I am remembering correctly, didn't the argument go that it would be better to have a small sold-out ground and turn the rest away because that would encourage membership?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #62
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,584
    vCash
    1370000
    That's one of the points Andy....the actual argument was that the view was better in a rectangular stadium and this would create demand for tickets.

    The thing about a small sold out ground (in my opinion) is that I'd rather watch at a smaller sold out ground with a good view than be guaranteed a good seat where I can't see the game!

    Can't speak for others though.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  3. #63
    (a.k.a. Mr Pinkbits) Stone Cold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,327
    vCash
    5000000
    Just heard the news...very happy with 27k...the atmosphere we generated with 18k there was awesome...50% more force supporters and it will be out of control!

    Good work WA Gov...thanks also for Wolves coming over and clinching the deal...ice bins - classic

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    coz Stone Cold says so

  4. #64
    Veteran Sheikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,920
    vCash
    28954136
    GIGS - yep, if the Force crowds out-grew a 27,000 stadium, then expand to 40,000. If that could be done prior to 2022, all the better.

    But if Australia wins (sorry, hosts) the 2022 World Cup and the federal government is paying for a new stadium, do we care?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #65
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,265
    vCash
    5112000
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheikh View Post
    GIGS - yep, if the Force crowds out-grew a 27,000 stadium, then expand to 40,000. If that could be done prior to 2022, all the better.

    But if Australia wins (sorry, hosts) the 2022 World Cup and the federal government is paying for a new stadium, do we care?
    And therein will be the rub. As the PerthNow article says:
    "The first step in the project...will be to demolish the scaffold stand on the eastern side of the ground...The second stage will be to replace the current grandstand with the goal ends linked under one roof in the final stage....The government has based its plan on Skilled Park on the Gold Coast that opened in March last year and holds 27,400 spectators, has 100 open corporate boxes, 25 closed corporate suites and two 450 seat function rooms."

    No mention of future expansion, but here is a picture of their template.



    Don't see much scope for cramming in another 12,000 seats. It is what everyone has been agitating for, and there is not likely to be anything more. If a Soccer WC eventuates and there is any federal funding to be had, it will be directed to the subsequent major stadium/Subi redevelopment.

    Quote Originally Posted by GIGS20 View Post
    That's one of the points Andy....the actual argument was that the view was better in a rectangular stadium and this would create demand for tickets.
    And demand for tickets + strictly limited number of available seats = ???

    Still, when demand grows there will always be the bigger stadium available. Hopefully the WAFC won't be managing it, but as the only permanent tenant...

    But then we've all had this discussion before, many times.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #66
    Legend Contributor Thequeerone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wanneroo
    Posts
    5,348
    vCash
    5000000
    12,000 seats vertically ?

    Wouldn't the stadium look better if it had "Woodside" or "Emirates" on the roof

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    61 years between Grand Slams Was the wait worth it - Ya betta baby

  7. #67
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,265
    vCash
    5112000
    Interesting point. I wonder what the roof is made of - if it were fabric and replaceable, that would be four large signage areas that could be sold off to sponsors.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #68
    Legend Contributor blueandblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    6,103
    vCash
    8992664
    Quote Originally Posted by Thequeerone View Post
    12,000 seats vertically ?

    Wouldn't the stadium look better if it had "Woodside" or "Emirates" on the roof
    and ET Mining!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "12 Years a Supporter" starring the #SeaOfBlue

  9. #69
    Veteran Contributor normie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beenup Heights
    Posts
    3,175
    vCash
    5000000
    TWF

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #70
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,584
    vCash
    1370000
    I thought the 40,000 seater for Soccer World Cup was on a greenfield?

    It's a pretty moot argument though, we won't have 40,000 seats for a bloody long time, and WNC was never going to curl up in a corner and go to sleep with 25,000 seats at MES.

    I actually agree with Burgs (and others) that 35,000 is what Rugby in WA NEEDS, My point was that in the climate where we were arguing, compromises needed to be made and 25,000 is better than staying at Subiaco. So I don't think my position has changed, but it might not appear that way.

    In the long run, any dedicated rectangular stadium is pretty much what the WA public supported overwhelmingly by signing the petition and any steps towards a dedicated rectangular stadium which adequately services RugbyWA is a good move.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  11. #71
    Champion Elf1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beldon
    Posts
    2,278
    vCash
    5000000
    I cannot but agree with Gigs on this. 25000 seats is a great start and sustainable with 35000 what we really need for rugby in the future.
    In the current climate and with govt dithering we will need to be circumspect and take what we can for the moment with room to move in the future.
    If we can maintain a full house every game then we have a case for further funding. If we cannot then the govt will probably put us on the backburner in the allocation of funding rounds.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #72
    (a.k.a. Mr Pinkbits) Stone Cold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,327
    vCash
    5000000
    for the next ten years (at the very least) for rugby in WA - 27K is perfect

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    coz Stone Cold says so

  13. #73
    Veteran Contributor The EnForcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,645
    vCash
    5000000
    I think with 27k seats and an expanded Super 15 games proposal we will be a pretty healthy franchise. Building a solid financial foundation for the future is more important to me than having a large stadium. Let's worry about that later.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Just happy to be here

  14. #74
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,265
    vCash
    5112000
    While I'm sure my views don't need restating, I certainly recognise how we got here and the completely reasonable expectations that everyone has for a nice slow orderly growth. However, as has been noted on this site (http://twf.com.au/showthread.php?p=223665), League is planning to return in 2013. That is 26 rounds for 13 home games. And the Soccer won't be sitting still; that is similarly 27 rounds for 13/14 home games. In the meantime Union will be sitting in a full stadium (almost from day one), telling all newcomers in the fastest growing city in Australia that their interest is appreciated, but the intention is to build a nice solid financial base on the strength of their 8 home games. Still, I'm sure the other codes will appreciate the overflow of support being diverted their way.

    I'm curious though - after only ten years, does anyone think the government be up for a complete rebuild or replacement rectangular stadium?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #75
    Legend
    Apprentice Bookie
    Contributor .X.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,703
    vCash
    -14759739
    Quote Originally Posted by The EnForcer View Post
    I think with 27k seats and an expanded Super 15 games proposal we will be a pretty healthy franchise. Building a solid financial foundation for the future is more important to me than having a large stadium. Let's worry about that later.
    Could not have put it better myself.

    From little things big things grow
    Posted via Mobile Device

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Stadium Rockers
    By AndyS in forum Stadiums
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-09, 15:35
  2. $45m bid to win World Cup
    By travelling_gerry in forum Stadiums
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-12-08, 10:40
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-03-08, 21:05
  4. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-03-08, 22:06
  5. Plans for a Dedicated Rectangular Stadium are Dead
    By Thequeerone in forum Stadiums
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 23-08-07, 14:20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •