Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 81

Thread: QRU turns to ARU for financial help

  1. #1
    Veteran TOCC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    3,597
    vCash
    5000000

    QRU turns to ARU for financial help

    Well there are some rumours getting out that the QRU is facing a massive financial loss and has turned to the ARU for assistance.

    I must stress it is only a rumour, however i believe there is some substance to it, gotta feel bad for Rod McCall, his only been in the job 6months and is probably going to feel the full effects of this.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Well, you'd have to expect that, having sat at the bottom of the table for so long, yet having such an awesome junior development program. Possibly they could be compensated for Qld juniors who get a contract.......I know we've had this one before, but I really wouldn't want to see QRU go under financially.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  3. #3
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,800
    vCash
    5526000
    Quote Originally Posted by GIGS20 View Post
    I know we've had this one before, but I really wouldn't want to see QRU go under financially.
    They won't. How many times has the NSWRU been bailed out?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  4. #4
    Veteran TOCC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    3,597
    vCash
    5000000
    they wont go under, they will be bailed out by someone, albeit the state government or the ARU.

    However it does highlight that a few issues need to be addressed, i think the biggest one is Ballymore, Ballymore is the crown jewel and the black hole of the QRU. At the moment its not paying its own return, they need to return games back to Ballymore but before that happens they need to spend $15-20million to get corporate and spectator facilities up to scratch, at the moment the QRU dont have that type of money.

    I think its about time the Reds went to private equity, giving the QRU a nice cash boost and letting them focus on developing the amateur arm of the game.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,800
    vCash
    5526000
    Does the QRU own Ballymore? Could be liqidised rather than go private equity? It's not much use having an asset if it's not generating income, unless they can predict a bigger profit in a later sale.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  6. #6
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Sell Ballymore an invest...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #7
    Veteran Sheikh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,907
    vCash
    28914136
    Selling Ballymore as an investment depends on: 1) what the Reds are paying for using Suncorp, and 2) how much they'd get for Ballymore.

    1) Suncorp might be expensive to rent - a 53,000 stadium for an average gate of 20,000. I'm not sure what we're paying for MES, but we were paying the AFL $2mill for Subi, all of which detracted from the playing budget.

    2) Looking at the location, selling Ballymore might get a few million, but the Reds would then have to build new offices and training facilities, wouldn't they?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Veteran TOCC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    3,597
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheikh View Post
    Selling Ballymore as an investment depends on: 1) what the Reds are paying for using Suncorp, and 2) how much they'd get for Ballymore.

    1) Suncorp might be expensive to rent - a 53,000 stadium for an average gate of 20,000. I'm not sure what we're paying for MES, but we were paying the AFL $2mill for Subi, all of which detracted from the playing budget.

    2) Looking at the location, selling Ballymore might get a few million, but the Reds would then have to build new offices and training facilities, wouldn't they?
    exactly Sheikh, its not as easy as just selling Ballymore, because the Reds will still need to build training and administration facilities somewhere, and sizeable land like that near the city isnt easy to come by.

    Im not sure on the rent of Suncorp because i believe the cost to hire goes up proportionately with the size of the crowd, however i think they need 18'000 just to break even.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #9
    Veteran zimeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    3,128
    vCash
    5000000
    i wonder what the break-even is on Subi... Dockers "NAP" cup game only got 14000...

    ---------- Post added at 15:35 ---------- Previous post was at 15:35 ----------

    sorry.. back on topic!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #10
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Quote Originally Posted by zimeric View Post
    i wonder what the break-even is on Subi
    Since the WAFC owns Subi, I'd suggest the break even is different for rugby than GayFL

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  11. #11
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Reds needs a shot off business realism... Just like their state Government running to the Feds for cash...

    Ballymore would make a truck load of cash for the Reds if used effectively... look at the Brumbies they have purchased property next to their small training facilities and are Co developing it into 220 million real-estate asset…. now that’s smart business... Reds take your asset and set up your long-term future...

    Reds admin need to take a good hard look their asset on the river and its huge potential… The Reds biggest asset isn’t their past its their future… smarten up gentlemen…

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #12
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,800
    vCash
    5526000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    Reds needs a shot off business realism... Just like their state Government running to the Feds for cash...
    While I don't disagree with looking at the potential of Ballymore, can you name me a state government that does not?

    A bit hypocritical to throw the Brumbies up as a shining example. They have their snouts in the defence budget everybody pays for. You evn like to call Naval assets at Jervis Bay "Brumbie's training camp."

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  13. #13
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    the Navy is a sponsor who pays its bills Shatamean... please remember that... still wearing firepower on your Force supporters jersey?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  14. #14
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,800
    vCash
    5526000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    the Navy is a sponsor who pays its bills Shatamean... please remember that... still wearing firepower on your Force supporters jersey?
    What has tha got to do with anyting? The Force's misadventures with Firepower are a possibility for any franchise not able to drink at the Government tit. If you are holding up the Navy as a legitimate commercial sponsor, would you like to explain why they need to sponsor a Rugby team to advertise? I'd rather the money was spent on legitimate commercial advertising to attract the best people or spent on hardware.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  15. #15
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Man you sucked that BS up and are still wearing the shirt? ... jeez best ask Tim mate, he can explain it to you, he got some time on his hands... nevertheless the Navy are a great supporter and sponsor... and they get the publicity goods from the Brumbies... a good investment...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Jonny Wilkinson turns to Buddha and turns his back on England
    By jargan83 in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 21-11-08, 16:19
  2. O'Neill turns to AFL as cure for federal issues
    By travelling_gerry in forum Wallabies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-04-08, 09:56
  3. J.B O'Reilly's turns 15 Today - $5 Pints
    By The InnFORCEr in forum Public Bar
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 08-01-08, 17:35
  4. Mood turns nasty over ARC
    By KenyaQuin in forum National Rugby Championship (NRC)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-12-07, 12:40
  5. Depardieu turns into Shrek
    By Burgs in forum Wallabies
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-07-07, 10:59

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •