Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Tony Lewis talks Force on SportFM

  1. #16
    Legend
    Apprentice Bookie
    Contributor .X.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,700
    vCash
    -14775739
    We seem to have got on to a debate about TMO.

    It is funny how Rugby survived 100+ years without a TMO. That's why we went to the pub after the match to whinge about. Now they are so intrusive that we are unable to go a full match without the TMO intruding and stopping play for something that happened 2 minutes prior.

    I wonder if the current uproar about the TMO whilst obviously related to the missed high shot by that evil bastard Swinton. Who had the misfortune of whacking our player. Had he not done this would we still be having the argument? Is this our collective Blue shaded goggles getting in the way of the bigger picture?

    Personally - I would like to see less TMO involvement. For Referees to confidently call a match - and for us the spectators to have confidence in their calls. Yes - On occasion something will be missed. It happens - Referees are humans. We have no right to expect perfection.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Exile
    Sydney


    "Pain heels. Chicks dig scars and Glory lasts forever." Shane Falco

  2. #17
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    In a ruck
    Posts
    149
    vCash
    5072000
    There is also still a massive influence from the home ground and broadcasters. The broadcasters choose what replays to show and then the crowd can influence the referees with booing etc. If it was a force home game I am sure it would have got picked up.

    I worry about how this aspect will be handled in France and the advantages they might get

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #18
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    fremantle
    Posts
    803
    vCash
    4508000
    Quote Originally Posted by .X. View Post
    We seem to have got on to a debate about TMO.

    It is funny how Rugby survived 100+ years without a TMO. That's why we went to the pub after the match to whinge about. Now they are so intrusive that we are unable to go a full match without the TMO intruding and stopping play for something that happened 2 minutes prior.

    I wonder if the current uproar about the TMO whilst obviously related to the missed high shot by that evil bastard Swinton. Who had the misfortune of whacking our player. Had he not done this would we still be having the argument? Is this our collective Blue shaded goggles getting in the way of the bigger picture?

    Personally - I would like to see less TMO involvement. For Referees to confidently call a match - and for us the spectators to have confidence in their calls. Yes - On occasion something will be missed. It happens - Referees are humans. We have no right to expect perfection.
    Yeah im of the same thinking as you on the interjection of the TMO, but whether it happened to us, Crusaders, Cheetahs, Saracens etc i would hope that if the neutral doctor calls a player for HIA that the TMO would call stop and sort it out. Never mind that the touchies should be onto it before then as well. Obviously collisions are going to happen but incidents like the mug on the weekend well thats just plain amateur hour from the professionals in charge.
    Same questionable officiating happened with the Drua Brumbies game as well.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #19
    Senior Player Leo86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    745
    vCash
    5540000
    I agree with less of the TMO, it was horrendous last year. They have made a decision of less input but I believe they were to intervene in acts of foul play.

    I think the on field ref should be the only one in charge and be able to refer to the TMO. The TMO should only intervene in acts of dangerous play and if referred to. Gardner asking the TMO if in touch or not should not of been shutdown but a "Yes sir".

    Would I still be having this argument. Yes in the case of a HIA, yes.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #20
    Senior Player Leo86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    745
    vCash
    5540000
    Quote Originally Posted by Garry Owen View Post
    If it was a force home game I am sure it would have got picked up.
    I can't remember the game from last year but there was 2 incidents in one game at HBF where the doctor had to yell at the Touchie to recognise there was a player knocked out on the field

    Edit:
    Searched and found my comment from at the time. It was Kahui and Winchester against the Hurricanes. 28th of May

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #21
    Player chiraag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Northbridge
    Posts
    485
    vCash
    5502000
    I have noticed a lot more instances of players staying down in the last 2 seasons or so in the hope of a TMO review leading to a card, which is making it tougher for the officials.

    Absolutely not an excuse for this case though.

    I do also believe there is a second TMO now who is there to review yellow/red card officials so the main TMO can continue with the live game. So there should be 2 TMO's looking for foul play.
    Unfortunately they often appear to be concentrating on far less important matters and intersecting when they shouldn't.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #22
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Quote Originally Posted by .X. View Post
    I have no clue how the room for the TMO is set up. I have no idea if he has one monitor or 7. But one thing is for certain - the TMO is all by him/herself.
    Most of the tv watchers saw itI'm confident they all only had one set of eyes and one screen.Add a revind facility and it's an easy check.For the record, I didn't pick up obvious bias from this ref, however he certainly changed the way he reffed the breakdown from previous matches, virtually ignoring jackalers, or penalizing them unless it was instant, perfectly clean etc. Tackled players were given ages to release the ball.This did, however, go both ways and it's almost as if the tahs knew in advance to counterruck, not put hands on the ball..The two poor non calls were Swinton, who should have played 2 minutes of that match and vailanus foot in touch which resulted in a try and was refused to be reviewed.On those two incidents, I believe they are so glaringly controversial that some public statement is required.Tahs fans also mention Jorgenson being collared during a contest for the high ball which I thought was 2 players competing in the air and it was called that way.A rare bad performance from Gus Gardner imho

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  8. #23
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Quote Originally Posted by boof1050 View Post
    Wouldn't that set the cat amongst the pigeons! I wonder if the dopes from the STAN commentary are going to have a chat about it.
    I fuggin hope not.I don't think my tv would survive Turinui and Maloney bleating about how this penalty is too harsh because he's a great bloke who plays hard and Australian rugby needs more players like him.I have noted that the judiciary have made no mention of previous record in their statement, despite this commonly being mentioned when reducing a sanction. It goes both ways doesn't it?

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  9. #24
    Immortal Contributor The InnFORCEr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West Leederville
    Posts
    16,907
    vCash
    3130000
    Quote Originally Posted by chiraag View Post

    I do also believe there is a second TMO now who is there to review yellow/red card officials so the main TMO can continue with the live game. So there should be 2 TMO's looking for foul play.
    Unfortunately they often appear to be concentrating on far less important matters and intersecting when they shouldn't.
    This is correct, there is extra TMO doing the red card upgrade reviews.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?

    Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!

    Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!

  10. #25
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Quote Originally Posted by The InnFORCEr View Post
    This is correct, there is extra TMO doing the red card upgrade reviews.
    So...to be clearFIVE professional referees missed the Swinton assault?Upon listening to cronnys interview on pick n drive it also appears that the medical officials cleared him to return to the field despite being "non verbal" It's starting to sound too bad to be mere incompetence, especially since I hear nothing about refs being sat down a week for such a shitty performance.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Tony Lewis interview
    By NewsBot in forum Rugby
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-02-23, 17:30
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 18-01-22, 19:09
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-11-21, 15:22
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-05-21, 19:45
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-04-21, 18:56

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •